Why not start with npm private packages?
You can. PackagePass starts to make sense when private package access needs to follow customer contracts, previews, CI jobs, or generated package delivery.
npm private packages alternative
Choose npm private packages when collaborators are the access boundary. Choose PackagePass when install access needs to follow a customer, project, CI job, or generated package recipient.
Quick verdict
npm private packages
Private packages for teammates and chosen collaborators.
PackagePass
Package-level access for customers, projects, and CI.
Decision table
Most private npm registries can serve a tarball. The harder question is who should be allowed to install which package, for how long, and how quickly you can explain a denied install.
What changes in practice
Give a customer install access to a purchased SDK without adding them as a broad package collaborator.
Ship generated clients under one registry while controlling who can install each package.
Revoke or rotate install access when a trial, contract, or support window changes.
packagepass tokens create install --package @acme/payments --subject customer:globexBottom line
PackagePass is not trying to replace your source host or every artifact repository. It is for the moment private npm packages become something you distribute to customers, projects, preview environments, and CI.
FAQ
You can. PackagePass starts to make sense when private package access needs to follow customer contracts, previews, CI jobs, or generated package delivery.
Yes. Use scoped registry configuration so PackagePass handles the private scope while public dependencies still resolve normally.
Source notes
Comparison claims are based on the public product documentation linked here. Product behavior can change, so treat these as source notes rather than permanent limits.